In a surprising twist for Ripple, a recent judicial decision has thrown a spotlight on procedural missteps, yet it leaves the company’s landmark victory intact. On May 15, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected a proposed settlement between Ripple and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), citing procedural irregularities. Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, maintains that the decision doesn’t undermine Ripple’s legal triumph, which was affirmed in March when the case was declared resolved.
Unpacking the Court’s Decision
Judge Torres’s ruling didn’t come as a rebuke of Ripple’s legal position but rather highlighted the improper filing of the settlement motion. The joint request from Ripple and the SEC was deemed “procedurally improper” because it failed to meet the necessary legal criteria for vacating an injunction and reducing civil penalties. Essentially, the filing didn’t align with the requirements needed to support their proposed settlement.
Critics and industry insiders have been quick to scrutinize the court’s decision. “The procedural dismissal reflects a lack of attention to detail in an otherwise strategic settlement plan,” notes crypto legal expert Jamie Collins. The legal community is buzzing with speculation about how Ripple and the SEC could have overlooked such technicalities in a case of this magnitude. For a deeper dive into the regulatory implications, see our coverage of the SEC’s latest guidance.
Ripple’s Legal Standing Remains Firm
Despite the procedural hiccup, Ripple’s victory remains untouched. Alderoty was quick to reassure stakeholders that the ruling does not alter the established legal standing of XRP. “The rejection is purely procedural and doesn’t change XRP’s status as a non-security,” Alderoty reiterated, seeking to calm a community eager for clarity.
However, the lack of detailed explanations from Ripple regarding the procedural issues has left some community members feeling uneasy. “It’s not enough to just say it’s procedural,” commented one XRP enthusiast on social media. “We need a clearer picture of what went wrong.” This sentiment resonates with many in the cryptocurrency sphere who demand transparency from key players in the market.
Community Reactions and Market Implications
The broader crypto community has been vocal about the need for more transparency. Ripple’s decision to resolve the case with the SEC, which included a reduced $125 million fine—of which the SEC will retain $50 million—was initially seen as a final chapter in a long legal saga. Yet, this recent development has rekindled discussions about the implications for Ripple and the regulatory landscape. This follows a pattern of institutional adoption, which we detailed in our analysis of corporate treasury investments.
Interestingly, this legal skirmish comes amid swirling rumors about potential political influences. Speculation has emerged surrounding former President Donald Trump and alleged connections to Ripple-linked lobbyists. Reports suggest a potential inclusion of XRP in national cryptocurrency reserve plans, a notion that’s drawn sharp criticism from Bitcoin purists advocating for a Bitcoin-only reserve.
Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Ripple?
What does this mean for Ripple moving forward? The company’s ability to navigate these procedural challenges will be crucial in maintaining market confidence. The community’s call for transparency suggests that Ripple must be more forthcoming about their legal strategies and procedural compliance.
For now, Ripple’s path appears steady, albeit with a few bumps in the road. The procedural misstep serves as a reminder that even giants in the crypto world must tread carefully within the legal system. As the case continues to unfold, stakeholders and observers alike will be keen to see how Ripple addresses these procedural concerns and what this means for its future dealings with the SEC.
In a rapidly evolving crypto landscape, Ripple’s experience is a telling example of the intricate dance between innovation and regulation. It raises questions about how companies can better prepare for the legal complexities that come with regulatory scrutiny, especially in an industry that often finds itself at odds with traditional financial oversight. The next few months will be pivotal for Ripple as it seeks to reinforce its legal standing while addressing the community’s demand for clarity and accountability.
Source
This article is based on: Ripple: Judge’s settlement rejection has no effect on legal victory
Further Reading
Deepen your understanding with these related articles:
- The SEC Can Learn From the IRS in Making Regulation Simpler for Crypto
- US crypto groups urge SEC for clarity on staking
- U.S. Congress Braces for Intense Debate Over Crypto Legislation This Summer (openai)
Steve Gregory is a lawyer in the United States who specializes in licensing for cryptocurrency companies and products. Steve began his career as an attorney in 2015 but made the switch to working in cryptocurrency full time shortly after joining the original team at Gemini Trust Company, an early cryptocurrency exchange based in New York City. Steve then joined CEX.io and was able to launch their regulated US-based cryptocurrency. Steve then went on to become the CEO at currency.com when he ran for four years and was able to lead currency.com to being fully acquired in 2025.
