As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, Coinbase finds itself at a pivotal crossroads. The renowned digital asset exchange is now grappling with mounting friction from traditional banks that are pushing regulators to limit crypto firms’ access to stablecoin-related services. This scenario begs the question: Does Coinbase want to become a bank?
The Clash with Traditional Banks
Coinbase’s journey has not been without its hurdles, especially as it faces increasing scrutiny from established financial institutions. Traditional banks have expressed concerns about the growing influence of crypto companies, particularly in the realm of stablecoins, which are digital currencies pegged to stable assets like the US dollar. Banks argue that without stringent regulation, these stablecoins could undermine financial stability.
In response, some banks have urged regulators to restrict crypto firms’ access to services related to stablecoins. They fear that the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies might bypass established financial systems, creating a parallel structure that operates beyond the reach of traditional oversight.
Coinbase’s Strategic Moves
Despite these challenges, Coinbase has shown no signs of slowing down. Instead, it’s ramping up efforts to expand its services, possibly hinting at ambitions that align closely with those of traditional banks. Over the past year, Coinbase has diversified its offerings, venturing into areas like lending, custody, and even earning interest on crypto holdings.
In August 2025, Coinbase announced a new initiative allowing users to earn interest on their crypto assets directly through the platform. By offering services that mimic traditional banking products, Coinbase is undoubtedly blurring the lines between a crypto exchange and a financial institution. This move could be seen as a step towards establishing itself as a full-fledged bank, albeit one grounded in digital assets.
Regulatory Challenges
However, the path to becoming a bank isn’t straightforward, especially for a crypto company. Regulatory hurdles abound, with agencies worldwide grappling to formulate frameworks that adequately address the unique challenges and risks posed by digital currencies. In the United States, the regulatory environment remains fragmented, with various agencies like the SEC and CFTC holding differing views on how cryptocurrencies should be regulated.
Coinbase has been proactive in engaging with regulators, advocating for clearer regulations that would enable innovation while ensuring consumer protection. Earlier this year, the company formed a dedicated team to liaise with policymakers, aiming to influence the development of crypto regulations that could accommodate its growing ambitions.
The Case for Becoming a Bank
From a strategic standpoint, becoming a bank could offer Coinbase several advantages. First and foremost, it would provide a sense of legitimacy and trust, crucial elements in an industry often marred by skepticism. With a banking license, Coinbase could offer a wider range of services, including insured deposits, which are currently the stronghold of traditional banks.
Moreover, being recognized as a bank could facilitate easier access to banking services for Coinbase itself, a significant pain point for many crypto companies. Traditional banks have historically been wary of offering services to crypto firms, fearing potential regulatory repercussions. A banking license would likely alleviate these concerns, allowing Coinbase to operate more seamlessly within the financial ecosystem.
The Skepticism and Risks
Yet, not everyone is convinced that Coinbase should—or even wants to—become a bank. Critics argue that the essence of cryptocurrencies lies in their ability to operate outside traditional financial systems. By becoming a bank, Coinbase could risk alienating a core segment of its customer base that values decentralization and independence from established institutions.
There’s also the risk of increased regulatory scrutiny. Banks are subject to a myriad of regulations designed to ensure financial stability and consumer protection. Adhering to these regulations could stifle the innovative spirit that has been the hallmark of Coinbase’s success.
What Lies Ahead?
The future for Coinbase is shrouded in possibilities. Whether it decides to pursue a banking license or continue operating as a crypto exchange, its actions will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.
For now, Coinbase appears to be treading a fine line, exploring opportunities within the traditional banking sphere while retaining its core identity as a pioneer in digital assets. As the debate over the role of crypto firms in the financial sector continues, all eyes will be on Coinbase to see if it can successfully bridge the gap between the old and the new.
In the ever-evolving world of finance, one thing is clear: the lines between traditional and digital finance are blurring, and companies like Coinbase are at the forefront of this transformation. Whether they choose to embrace the banking model or carve out a new path remains to be seen, but their impact on the financial landscape is undeniable.

Steve Gregory is a lawyer in the United States who specializes in licensing for cryptocurrency companies and products. Steve began his career as an attorney in 2015 but made the switch to working in cryptocurrency full time shortly after joining the original team at Gemini Trust Company, an early cryptocurrency exchange based in New York City. Steve then joined CEX.io and was able to launch their regulated US-based cryptocurrency. Steve then went on to become the CEO at currency.com when he ran for four years and was able to lead currency.com to being fully acquired in 2025.


