This guide is part of the “Guide to Staking Crypto” series.
Staking is easy. You lock your crypto, the blockchain network pays you, and your balance grows. But questions start to arise when you compare validators and see different payouts or when your rewards change from week to week. What is really happening under the hood?
This guide will explain the moving parts in a way that will hopefully make sense. We will cover the core factors of staking, explain the plain math behind rewards, and give you some practical tips.
We will cover staking on Ethereum, Cardano, and Solana. By reading through till the end you will know how to read the numbers, compare your options, and choose a staking platform/validator based on an understanding of the topic.
Table of Contents
The six key factors that shape staking rewards
Staking rewards are not random. They are set out in each blockchain’s official documentation. Every network follows clear rules defined by the protocol, and the final outcome also depends on how participants choose to stake. The size of the reward pool and how it gets divided are shaped by both the network’s design and the actions of investors.
Here are the main factors investors need to keep in mind:
Network inflation rate
Most proof-of-stake systems create new tokens each block or each “epoch” to pay for security. That new issuance forms the reward pool. Higher inflation means a larger pie. Lower inflation means a smaller pie. Think of it like monetary policy that is executed by code inside the protocol instead of a central bank.
Staking participation rate
“Participation” rate is the share of circulating crypto supply that is actively staked. If the pie size stays the same yet more people stake, slices get thinner and your rewards rate falls. If fewer people stake, slices get thicker and your rewards rate rises.
This is the main reason an advertised APY usually declines over time. The network responds to how many additional tokens are helping to validate each transaction by lowering everyone’s payout.
Validator uptime and performance
Validators are the computer guys that run nodes. One validator suggests the next page in the ledger, while the others check it over and sign off. The incentives for these guys to be reliable and honest are pool rewards.
If a validator stays online and signs reliably, the pool earns its full share. If it misses some of its duties, the pool earns less because fewer blocks were validated.
If it breaks any of the “rules”, many networks enforce slashing, which destroys a portion of the stake itself. That loss hits the validator and the delegators tied to that validator. This means uptime is not a marketing line. It is an important factor to pay attention to if you’re looking for the best staking returns.
Validator commission fees
Most delegators do not run any nodes themselves. Most people involved in staking are delegators. They delegate to a competent validator with the right hardware and know how. Validators take a commission from rewards as payment for their operations and risk.
Your individual staked amount
Your stake is your weight inside the pool. What that means is that if you own 1% of a validator’s total delegated stake (after commission), you receive about 1% of the total rewards for that validator. The relationship is direct and simple. The bigger your stake means a larger share of whatever the pool earns.
Reward compounding frequency
Compounding is the quiet force behind home run results. Some networks or wallets automatically add each period’s reward back to your stake. Others require you to claim and re stake.
When rewards compound more frequently, you have a larger APY over time. APR is the simple yearly rate without compounding. APY includes compounding. If you plan to re-stake regularly, use tools that support auto-compounding or set yourself a schedule and do your best to stick to it.
How to estimate rewards
At this point, we have covered the main factors influencing staking rewards, but it helps to see them all in one place. While every blockchain has its own design, you can think of staking rewards with a simple model:
Reward = Validator Rewards × (1 − Commission) × (Your Stake ÷ Total Stake with Validator)
Here is what each term means:
- Validator Rewards – The amount earned by the validator in a given period, set by network inflation, transaction fees, and performance.
- Commission – The percentage the validator keeps as their service fee. Subtracting it leaves the amount available for delegators.
- Your Stake – The number of tokens you have delegated.
- Total Stake with Validator – The total tokens delegated to that validator by all participants, including their own self-stake.
Example: Suppose the network distributes rewards and your chosen validator earns 100 tokens in one epoch. The validator charges a 5% commission, so 5 tokens go to them, leaving 95 tokens for delegators. If your stake represents 2% of all tokens delegated to that validator, your reward is calculated like this:
Reward = 100 × (1 − 0.05) × (0.02) = 1.9 tokens for the epoch
This is a simplified model, but it captures the essentials. In real life, the size of Validator Rewards will shift as participation changes, blocks are missed, transaction fees rise or fall, or protocol updates adjust the inflation. The rest of the math stays the same.
Case studies on major networks
To see how these principles work in practice, let’s look at how leading blockchains structure their staking rewards and where their systems differ from one another.
Ethereum
Ethereum rewards come from two sources, priority fees paid by users and new token issuance that adjusts based on how many validators are active. The more ETH that is staked, the smaller the share each validator receives, which means rewards rates usually fall as the validator set grows.
Validator performance matters a lot, since missed attestations reduce the rewards for that period, and slashing will apply if a validator is dishonest or offline for too long. Compounding is not built into Ethereum itself, but many staking platforms reinvest rewards automatically or allow you to claim and restake.
Gas fees also play a role, since they affect how often and if compounding even makes sense. In the end, when staking with Ethereum your returns depend on overall participation, the reliability of your validator, and how you handle compounding.
Cardano
Cardano operates in five-day cycles called epochs. Each epoch has a set pool of rewards that is distributed to stake pools according to their size and performance. Similar to Ethereum, when a pool grows too large and approaches saturation, the rewards are reduced. This in turn pushes delegators to spread their stake across the network.
Because epochs are regular and predictable, rewards are paid on a steady schedule. Delegation is also easy and keeps your coins liquid, since with Cardano, your principal amount is never locked up. This makes it easy to switch pools without waiting through a long unbonding period.
Solana
Solana uses an inflation schedule that started high to attract early validators and gradually decreased over time. Rewards are paid each epoch (2-3 days) and depend on the validator uptime and overall network performance. Transaction fees also contribute to the reward pool, so active and stable validators tend to give better results.
Because the number of new SOL tokens being created each year is shrinking the average APY naturally trends lower unless the share of tokens being staked also falls. For delegators, choosing a validator with strong performance and reasonable fees can make a noticeable difference in long-term returns.
Risks that can reduce your staking rewards
Even with strong returns, there are risks that can reduce what you actually earn from staking. Understanding these risks beforehand helps you protect your capital and time.
Slashing risk
On networks with slashing enabled, if a validator makes serious mistakes or acts dishonestly, a portion of the staked tokens can be taken away. Both the validator and anyone who delegated to them share that loss. To reduce this risk, pick validators with a proven track record and good uptime.
Market volatility
Staking rewards are paid in the same token you staked, so the value of those rewards can rise or fall with the market. A 6% yield does little to help if the token price drops by 40%. Always remember you are exposed to the asset itself, not just the yield.
Lock-up and liquidity limits
Many blockchains require an unbonding period before you can withdraw your stake. This mechanism will lock your tokens for a set period of time. This will leave you unable to withdraw and sell during a market downturn. Calculate with this in mind and make sure that the staking lock-up fits your future cash needs.
Validator risk
Your earnings as a delegator mainly depend on the validator you choose. High commission fees, poor uptime, or unstable operations can lower your rewards. Look at the validators history of payouts, reliability, and community reputation rather than just their marketing.
Operational costs and fees
On networks with high transaction fees, claiming and restaking too often can eat into your returns. Set a compounding schedule that balances growth with cost. Auto-compounding tools can help here, but only if they charge a reasonable fee.
Protocol change risk
Blockchains are constantly being updated over time. This is a risk that introduces changes to inflation, reward sharing, and validator rules, all severely affecting your staking returns. It’s super important to stay informed, this is best done before governance updates. Governance updates are changes to the rules or parameters of a blockchain.
Why this matters to your portfolio
For professional traders and long-term investors, crypto staking is not a passive investment. Staking adds another layer of management to a portfolio, fitting in naturally next to spot exposure, arbitrage, and different trading strategies. Small changes have real impact.
Staking rewards are dynamic, not fixed. The headline APY is a starting point, but not the finish line. Your final outcome is ultimately dictated by inflation, participation, validator performance, commission, compounding, fees, and the price of the asset itself.
Once you understand these moving parts, you can make smarter choices and avoid common mistakes. The first time you see rewards arriving in your wallet, it feels magical. After you learn the rules of how it works, it feels like a craft.
We recommend running a small test, comparing different pools for a month, and applying what you learned here today. You will know exactly why you are receiving the rewards and how to improve the result for the next epoch. This is how you can turn crypto staking into a steady and predictable stream of income.

Steve Gregory is a lawyer in the United States who specializes in licensing for cryptocurrency companies and products. Steve began his career as an attorney in 2015 but made the switch to working in cryptocurrency full time shortly after joining the original team at Gemini Trust Company, an early cryptocurrency exchange based in New York City. Steve then joined CEX.io and was able to launch their regulated US-based cryptocurrency. Steve then went on to become the CEO at currency.com when he ran for four years and was able to lead currency.com to being fully acquired in 2025.